Kemal,
I created this thread for a lot of the reasons you stated. The ranking system is flawed, in that it takes way too long for the rating to catch up to a person's true skill level. GTO plans on addressing the issue later this year.
I am also a proponent of using some type of chess rating system, instead of what we have. With a rating system like that [which is only effected by 1v1 play] a person would be unable to raise his/her rating by noob hunting, because they would get fewer points for their win, while at the same time risk losing many more.
For instance, if I were to play an expert, I would have the chance of winning 32 pts, while risking only the loss of 2 pts., while the expert's change in rating would be the exact opposite. The problem with that: Not likely I'd get as many experts willing to play me as I do now. However, it doesn't seem to do me any good, because after 776 games, one can draw the conclusion that you can't teach this ol' dog new tricks. However, it would not be beneficial for those lower rated players who would benefit from playing experts. So, I don't know that adopting a chess rating system is the way to go.
The question posed by me in the OP, wasn't who the most experienced player was, it was who was the "strongest" meaning the one with the most skill [which would be demonstrated in their results against highly skilled players], that is still rated as an intermediate.
I was mainly curious in finding out if anyone knew of any intermediate players who were kickin' some experts around. That's all.
So, the question, for what I was searching for anyway, was perfectly phrased, unless readers have been misinterpreting my meaning of "strongest" as "experienced" instead of "skilled."


