kbaldy_77 wrote:Good job CC and bb82, seeding based on win percentage seems fair. My concern is tie breaker. If a lower seeded player, seeding being based on win percentage, plays well enough to tie with a higher seeded player i feel the tie breaker should be based solely on tourn play, not past record. Not sure how you would do that, just my thought.
Even when i was in school (a long time ago) state wrestling was seeded by your record during the year, but if the number 8 seed tied with the number 1 seed, they didnt just give it to the 1 seed, they made them fight it out, , until a there was a clear victor (OVERTIME). So, maybe in case of a tie an additional game would be more appropriate, what do you think?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest